The majority of the world’s Muslim population follows the Sunni branch of Islam, and approximately 10-15% of all Muslims follow the Shiite (Shi’ite, Shi’a, Shia)
40 KB – 9 Pages
PAGE – 2 ============
The majority of the world™s Muslim population follows the Sunni branch of Islam, and approximately 10-15% of all Muslims follow the Shiite (Shi™ite, Shi™a, Shia) branch. Shiite populations constitute a majority in Iran, Iraq, Ba hrain, and Azerbaijan. There are also significant Shiite populations in Afghanistan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen. Sunnis and Shiites share most basic religious tenets. However, their differences sometimes have been the basis for religious intolerance, political infighting, and sectarian violence. This report includes a historical background of the Sunni-Shiite split and discusses the differences in religious beliefs and practices between and within each Islamic sect as well as their similarities. The report also relates Sunni and Shiite religious beliefs to discussions of terrorism and sectarian violence that may be of interest during the 111 th Congress. Also see CRS Report RS21695, The Islamic Traditions of Wahhabism and Salafiyya , by Christopher M. Blanchard.
PAGE – 3 ============
Historical Background. ..1 Internationa l Terro rism.. 1 Sectarian Viol ence in Iraq.. .2 Core Beliefs and Shared Practices. ..2 Sunni Islam: Developmen t and Basic Tenets.3 Religious Practice s and Beliefs .3 Islamic Law.. ..3 Sectarian Divisions ..3 Shiite Islam: Developm ent and Basic Tenets.4 Leadership of the Community4 Shiite Practices a nd Core Beliefs. 4 Twelver Shiism.. 5 Ismaili or Seve ner Shiism 5 Other Shiite Sects. 5 Author Contact Informa tion.. .6
PAGE – 4 ============
The differences between the Sunni and Shiite Islamic sects are rooted in disagreements over the succession to the Prophet Muhammad, who died in 632 AD, and over the nature of leadership in the Muslim community. The historic debate centered on whether to award leadership to a qualified, pious individual who would follow the cu stoms of the Prophet or to transmit leadership exclusively through the Prophet™s bloodline. The question was settled initially when community leaders elected a companion of the Prophet™s name d Abu Bakr to become the first Caliph (Arabic for ﬁsuccessorﬂ). Although most Muslims accepted this decision, some supported the candidacy of Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Prophet™s cousin and son-in-law, husband of the Prophet™s daughter Fatima. Ali had played a prominent role during the Prophet™s lifetime, but he lacked seniority within the Arabian tribal system and was bypassed. This situation was unacceptable to some of Ali™s followers, who considered Abu Bakr and the two succeeding caliphs (Umar and Uthman) to be illegitimate. Ali™s followers believed that the Prophet Muhammad himself had named Ali as successor and that the status quo was a violation of divine order. A few of Ali™s partisans orchestrated the murder of the third Caliph Uthman in 656 AD, and Ali was named Caliph. Ali, in turn, wa s assassinated in 661 AD, and his son Hussein (680 AD) died in battle against forces of the Sunni caliph. Ali™s eldest son Hassan (d. 670 AD) is also revered by Shiite Muslims, some of who claim he was poisoned by the Sunni caliph Muawiyah. Those who supported Ali™s ascendancy became later known as ﬁShi™a,ﬂ a word stemming from the term ﬁ shi™at Ali,ﬂ meaning ﬁsupportersﬂ or ﬁhelpers of Ali.ﬂ Others respected and accepted the legitimacy of his caliphate but opposed political succession based on bloodline to the Prophet. This group, who constituted the majority of Muslims, came to be known in time as ﬁSunni,ﬂ meaning ﬁfollowers of [the Prophet™s] customs [ sunna].ﬂ The caliphate declined as a religious and political institution after the thirteenth century, although the term ﬁcaliphﬂ continued to be used by some Muslim leaders until it was abolished in 1924 by Turkey™s first President Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The decline and abolition of the caliphate became a powerful religious and political symbol to some Sunni Islamic activists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These activists argued that leaders in the Islamic world had undermined the caliphate by abandoning the ﬁtrue pathﬂ of Islam. Inspired by these figures, some contemporary Sunni extremists, such as Osama bin Laden and others, advocate the restoration of a new caliphate based on ﬁpureﬂ Islamic principles. The religious, ethnic, linguistic, and socio- economic diversity that exists within the global Muslim community present significant challenges to the reemergence of centralized, pan-sectarian, and widely recognized Islamic religious leadership. Islamic theology and sectarian considerations are rarely sufficient explanations for instances of terrorism and political violence in the contemporary Muslim world. Political, social, and economic factors often determine whether a give n dispute reflects sectarian identities or transcends them. Sunni and Shiite organizations and governments are known to collaborate when they perceive that their interests overlap. In other instances, theological differences can directly fuel sectarian hatred and violence. Members and supporters of terrorist organizations like Al
PAGE – 5 ============
Qaeda and its affiliates exhibit regional and theological diversity that makes it difficult to identify shared motives that can be linked to specific religious doctrines. Many Sunni and Shiite Muslims refer to members and supporters of Al Qaeda and similar groups simply as takfiris (Arabic for ﬁthose who accuse others of apostasyﬂ) becaus e of Al Qaeda™s habit of denouncing individuals who don™t accept a narrow interpretation of Sunni Islam as non-believers and legitimate targets. In Iraq, Sunni-Shiite relations have been complicated by the dramatic shift in power dynamics that accompanied the removal of the Sunni-dominated Saddam Hussein regime, which ended centuries of Sunni political dominance. Lingering Shiite resentment and Sunni fears associated with this shift have helped transform local and individual political or economic disputes into broader sectarian confrontations in some cases. Both Sunni and Shiite insurgent groups and militias have conducted attacks on coalition and Iraqi government forces and civilians since 2003. Although major Shiite political factions largely abandoned violent tactics in favor of political participation during 2005 and 2006, intra-Shiite political rivalries have led to outbreaks of violence, particularly in southern Iraq. Similarly, From 2006 through 2008, Sunni Iraqis in Baghdad, Al Anbar province, and other areas fought against predominantly Sunni insurgent groups, foreign fighters, and Al Qaeda operatives, whom they held responsible for ongoing violence in their communities. Although there are considerable differences between Sunni and Shiite Islam, the two Islamic sects share common traditions, beliefs, and doctrines. All Muslims believe that the Prophet Muhammad was the messenger of Allah (the Arabic word for God). All believe that they must abide by the revelations given to the Prophet by Allah (as recorded in the Quran) and by the hadith (sayings of the Prophet and his companions). The concepts of piety, striving for goodness, and social justice are fundamental to Islamic belief and practice. Additionally, all Muslims are expected to live in accordance with the five pillars of Islam: (1) shahada Šrecital of the creed ﬁThere is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is His Prophetﬂ; (2) salat Šfive obligatory prayers in a day; (3) zakat Šgiving alms to the poor; (4) sawm Šfasting from sunrise to sunset during the month of Ramadan; and (5) hajj Šmaking a pilgrimage to Mecca once during a lifetime if one is physically and financially able. The basic sources for Islamic jurisprudence, be it Sunni or Shiite, are the Quran, the sunna (customs of the Prophet Muhammad) as relayed in the hadith, qiyas (analogy), ijma™ (consensus), and ijtihad (individual reasoning). The primary function of the learned religious leaders is the interpretation of Islamic law ( shari™a ). There are no codified laws in either Sunni or Shiite Islam. Rather, there are sources for the interpretation of law, and these sources are similar among Shiites and Sunnis. Shiite hadith differ from Sunni hadith , mainly in that they include the sayings of the Shiite imams who are considered to have been divinely inspired. Shiite legal interpretation also allows more space for human reasoning than Sunni interpretation does.
PAGE – 6 ============
˝ The majority of Muslims today are Sunnis. They accept the first four Caliphs (including Ali) as the ﬁrightly guidedﬂ rulers who followed the Prophet. In theory, Sunnis believe that the leader (imam ) of the Muslim community should be selected on the basis of communal consensus, on the existing political order, and on a leader™s individual merits. This premise has been inconsistently practiced within the Sunni Muslim community th roughout history. Sunni Muslims do not bestow upon human beings the exalted status given only to prophets in the Quran, in contrast to the Shiite veneration of imams. Sunnis have a less elaborate and arguably less powerful religious hierarchy than Shiites. In contrast to Shiites, Sunni religious teachers historically have been under state control. At the same time, Sunni Islam tends to be more flexible in allowing lay persons to serve as prayer leaders and preachers. In their day-to-day practices, Sunnis and Shiites exhibit subtle differences in the performance of their obligatory prayers. Both groups share a similar understanding of basic Islamic beliefs. Within Sunni Islam, there are four schools of juri sprudence that offer alternative interpretations of legal decisions affecting the lives of Muslims. The four schools of jurisprudence rely mostly on analogy as a way to formulate legal rulings, and they also give different weight to the sayings of the Prophet and his companions (hadith) within their decisions. In some secular countries, such as Turkey, the opinions issued by religious scholars represent moral and social guidelines for how Muslims should practice their religion and are not considered legally binding. The four legal schools, which vary on certain issues from strict to broad legal interpretations, are the (1) Hanafi: this is the oldest school of law. It wa s founded in Iraq by Abu Hanifa (d. 767 AD). It is prevalent in Turkey, Central Asia, the Balkans, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh; (2) Maliki: this was founded in the Arabian Peninsula by Malik ibn Anas (d. 795 AD). It is prevalent in North Africa, Mauritania, Kuwait, and Bahrain; (3) Shaf™i: this school was founded by Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi™i (d. 819 AD). It is prevalent in Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, parts of Yemen, Indonesia, and Malaysia; and (4) Hanbali: this was founded by Ahmad Hanbal (d. 855). It is prev alent in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, parts of Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. Sunni Islam has had less prominent sectarian divisions than Shiite Islam. The Ibadi sect, which is centered mostly in Oman, East Africa, and in parts of Algeria, Libya, and Tunisia, has been sometimes misrepresented as a Sunni sect. Ibadi religious and political dogma generally resembles basic Sunni doctrine, although the Ibadis are neither Sunni nor Shiite. Ibadis believe strongly in the existence of a just Muslim society and argue that religious leaders should be chosen by community leaders for their knowledge and piety, without regard to race or lineage.
PAGE – 8 ============
flagellation. As a minority that was often persecuted by Sunnis, Shiites found solace in the Ashura ritual, the telling of the martyrdom of Hussein and the moral lessons to be learned from it, which reinforced Shiite religious traditions and practices. Twelver ShiismŠthe most common form of Shiism todayŠis pervasive in Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and Bahrain. Twelvers accept a line of twelve infallible imams descendent from Ali and believe them to have been divinely appointed from birth. The twelve imams are viewed as harbors of the faith and as the designated interpreters of law and theology. Twelvers believe that the twelfth and last of these imams ﬁdisappearedﬂ in the late ninth century. This ﬁhidden imamﬂ is expected to return to lead the community. Following the twelfth imam™s disappearance, as one scholar notes, a ﬁpacifistﬂ trend emerged among Twelvers who ﬁchose to withdraw from politics and quietly await his coming.ﬂ 2 In the twentieth century, changes in the political landscape of the Middle East led to a new competing ﬁactivistﬂ trend among Twelver groups in Iran and Lebanon, typified by the late Iranian religious leader Ayatollah Khomeini. Although most Shiites agree on the basic premise that Ali was the first rightful imam, they disagree on his successors. The Ismailis, who are the second largest Shiite sect, broke off in the eighth century, recognizing only the first seven imams (the seventh was named Ismail, hence the names ﬁIsmailiﬂ and ﬁSevenerﬂ). Historically and at least until the sixteenth century, the Ismailis were far more disposed than the Twelvers to pursuing military and territorial power. In the past, they established powerful ruling states, which played significant roles in the development of Islamic history. Today, Ismailis are scattered throughout the world but are prominent in Afghanistan (under the Naderi clan), in India, and in Pakistan. There are also Ismaili communities in East and South Africa. The Zaydis , who acknowledge the first five imams and differ over the identity of the fifth, are a minority sect of Shiite Islam, mostly found in Yemen. The Zaydis reject the concepts of the imams™ infallibility and of a ﬁhidden imam.ﬂ Other sects, such as the Alawites and Druzes, are generally considered to be derived from Shiite Islam, although their religious practices are secretive, and some do not regard their adherents as Muslims. Alawites exist mostly in Syria and Lebanon. The Assad family that effectively has ruled Syria since 1971 are Alawite. Many Alawites interpret the pillars (duties) of Islam as symbolic rather than applied, and celebrate an eclectic group of Christian and Islamic holidays. In Turkey, the Alevi s are an offshoot group of Shiite Islam that has been often confused with Syrian Alawites or other Shiites. Not much is known about their religious practices. Most Alevis are well-integrated into Turkish society and speak both Turkish and Kurdish. The Druze community was an eleventh-century offshoot of Ismaili Shiite Islam and is concentrated in Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, and Israel. Today, the Druze faith differs considerably from mainstream Shiite Islam. 2 Roy Parviz Mottahedeh, ﬁKeeping the Shiites Straight,ﬂ Religion in the News 6, no. 2 (2003).
40 KB – 9 Pages